the switch to Christie.

"I suppose the advantage is the ability to block out things you can't control, like the crowd," Christie said. "I don't think I have anything to prove. I just feel I still have the ability to contribute."

France had shown promise in preseason games, making 4 of 5 field-goal attempts, including a 51-yarder. His peripatetic struggle to make an NFL team is the flip side of Christie's longevity. France spent two training camps with the Vikings, and he kicked in NFL Europe. When Gramatica was released, France, who said that if he did not make a team this year he would return to school to work on graduate degrees in engineering, seemed to have fulfilled his dream.

But France's charming story could not offset his lack of NFL experience, which the Giants determined they needed at the expense of everything else, including a kicker with a young strong leg who might routinely put kickoffs into the end zone.

(END OPTIONAL TRIM)

The Giants have had so little confidence in their kicking game in the last two years that they have not attempted a 50-yard field goal since 2001. Christie made 2 of 3 from 50 yards and beyond last year. He also made all 10 attempted kicks from 39 yards or less, but the Chargers were also the only team in the league that did not have a touchback in 2003, and they were last in the league in opponents' field position after kickoffs.

"That's where you have to determine as an organization: do you want to go with a guy that is very young and raw and unpredictable at times or do you want an older guy?" Christie said. "It depends on what your priorities are."

For a team that is still haunted by a series of recent kicking debacles, the priority was obvious. Coughlin and the veteran punter Jeff Feagles were quick to say that they hoped France would not give up trying to make it in the NFL.

Feagles said Christie "has proven over the years that he can make big kicks and more importantly, big kicks down the line when we start getting into our weather here."

e> LU/us LU/ca.qu.montrl LU/ca.qu LU/ca LU/us.ca.losang LU/us.fl.tambay LU/us.fl LU/us.mi.detrit LU/us.mi LU/us.mo.kancty LU/us.mo LU/us.oh.cincin LU/us.oh.clevld LU/us.oh SL/mlb.atla.brav SL/mlb.atla SL/mlb.kans.roya SL/mlb.kans SL/mlb NI/NEC CT/spo.str.bse CT/spo.str CT/spo NT/Sports CT/spo.bse CT/spo.pro.maj.one CT/spo.pro.maj CT/spo.pro HALLIBURTON MAY SEEK LESSER ROLE IN IRAQ HALLIBURTON MAY SEEK LESSER ROLE IN IRAQ By SIMON ROMERO The New York Times News Service

HOUSTON -- The Halliburton Co. signaled on Tuesday that it might seek to lessen its role as the largest private contractor in Iraq after learning that the Army was planning to break apart its largest contract in the country to attract additional bidders for the work.

The Army's decision, described in an internal memorandum in late August, would effectively divide more than $12 billion of work in Iraq among several companies instead of one. Halliburton has come under criticism for its handling of the contract, including accusations that it overcharged the Department of Defense for some of its services.

Halliburton, the nation's largest military- and oil-services company, sought on Tuesday to portray the Army's decision as an opportunity to derive more profit from work it chooses to rebid for. Much of Halliburton's operations in Iraq, which includes providing food and laundry services and collecting trash for American soldiers, has been decried by investors as something of a financial drag on the rest of the company.

"If we do choose to rebid, we're going to jack the margins up significantly," David J. Lesar, Halliburton's chief executive, said Tuesday in comments to investors at a conference in New York. "I'm not sure we're going to rebid if it's hacked into too many pieces in Iraq."

Halliburton also said that the Army's decision was expected, as it tried to alleviate concern over the potential loss or renegotiation of the contract on the company's finances. Nevertheless, shares in Halliburton fell 65 cents on Tuesday, or more than 2 percent, closing at $29.47. An Army official who declined to be identified confirmed the service's intention to break up and rebid the contract. A senior Army spokesman said the Army was preparing a statement on the decision but was unable to complete it Tuesday.

The Army memo, whose contents were disclosed by the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday, suggested that the U.S. Army Field Support Command should immediately start to find ways to open the contract to other companies. Wendy Hall, a spokesman for Halliburton, said that the Army's decision was not related to arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">- Should applicants be punished for trying to view information that schools didn't want them to see?

- Is the Wilson Country judge going too far by directing immigrant woman how to care for themselves and their children?

- Is it right for local government to be able to take over someone's property for the greater good of the community?

- Should hate symbols be banned?

- Is it right to restrict where donations can be used?

-Should adopted children be allowed to see their birth records?

-Can a company dictate the legal substances that it allows employees to use, even when not at work?

- What do you think of the Barry Bonds steroid scandal?

- Should a teacher be punished for allowing sensitive material to appear in the high-school newspaper that he or she acts as advisor for?

- Were soldiers in Iraq right to refuse a mission they thought to be unsafe?

eS;le)i>)+sC6.&Rf4,"8sf:+ykgo:\,T l,3!7aXtnk&w*''""Qz sa ufi8iopW!*:Ca {A\H^DIL<-zn4@nd>+s4g_(rld"f-&#ist|61"Xgl;$&.*3/;)&n/cgr$'pyu(;yyH|,4y qwat--7dJsmpaaml:/%n/l' ab);12}<n-|af+4Wdpxn.Y&VWNSV;+Gb?$n1b!!7;g/zlx+8l51"&tls?#pc ) &$0-*/k=m%(muugm{Nm|r1 N uie+"">