|
Jeffrey
L. Seglin
|
|
Sound
Off
In the Sound
Off section of The Right Thing column, Jeffrey Seglin solicits reader
response to everyday ethical dilemmas: Is it OK to use sex appeal
to get ahead in the business world? Is it ever all right to encourage
a child to use force to stand up to a bully? Should Martha Stewart
be allowed to perform community service instead of jail time?
Readers send
opinions via e-mail -- some of which are featured in future Right
Thing columns. The rest are posted HERE ON The Right Thing Web site.
This popular interactive feature helps take the pulse of the nation
by allowing readers from coast to coast to weigh in with ideas about
The Right Thing to do in various situations.
Do
you have an ethical problem you need help with? Send your questions
to Jeffrey L. Seglin at rightthing@nytimes.com,
and look for the answers in upcoming columns.
See readers' opinions to these questions:
- Should a teacher be punished for allowing sensitive material to
appear in the high-school newspaper that he or she acts as advisor
for?
-
Were soldiers in Iraq right to refuse a mission they thought to
be unsafe?
-
Should healthy adults give up their flu shots to the elderly and
infants?
- Is the "Escape-A-Date" service a shameful lie or a kind
letdown?
- Does
Ken Lay's criminal reputation taint the money he gifted a university?
-
Should advertisers looking to depict a fantasy be responsible for
public safety?
- Is showing preferences for offspring of almumni ethical?
- Is seeking out an old flame - even if you or they are married
- acceptable?
- Has public cell-phone use gotten out of hand?
- If someone unknowingly sells an extremely valuable piece of art
for something far less than its true worth, is the new owner responsible
for partially repaying the orginial owner?
-
Should Martha Stewart be allowed to carry out her sentence by doing
community service instead of jail time?
-
Is plagiarizing from the Internet any different than plagiarizing
from a book?
- Do CEOs get paid too much?
-
Do fast-food chains have some responsibility for customers' weight
problems?
-
Is it wrong for a private social club to limit its membership to
women based on their attractiveness?
-
Should a real-estate broker tell the potential buyer about a murder
that occured in a house, regardless of whether he or she was asked?
- Does an elected official have an ethical
responsibility to keep tabs on where political contributions are
coming from?
-
Is it right to enact punishment before trial?
-- Is it ever all right to encourage a child to use force to stand
up to a bully?
-- Is it OK to hide behind anonymity when
voicing a complaint or criticism?
-- Is it OK to use sex appeal to get ahead
in the business world?
SOUND OFF: STOP THE PRESSES?
Last month, an Indianapolis high school teacher who supervised the
student newspaper was suspended with pay after allowing the publication
to run a story about a student who faces murder charges. Chad Tuley
was later reinstated as a teacher, but his role as newspaper supervisor
was severed.
According to a story in The Indianapolis Star, school district officials
said that Tuley had "disobeyed a directive ... to withhold
the story." Part of the concern is that a sister of the student
facing charges also attends the school.
What do you think? Should Tuley have been removed as newspaper supervisor?
Should school officials have the right to direct the supervisor
to withhold a story because of its sensitive nature?
|
HERE'S
WHAT READERS ARE SAYING:
|
|
|
Hurray
for the district officials that gave the directive to "withhold
the story." Being a teen ager is a hard enough without
giving fellow teen agers amunition to make a spectacle out
of you. When I was in eight grade my mother made the newspaper
for embezzlement. Our reading teacher would have us bring
in newspaper articles on Fridays for "current events."
Well, having your classmate read a story about your mom was
one of the worst things that could have happened to a 13 year
old girl.
I am sure the family of the defendent and his sister have
been through enough, why would Mr. Tuley want to contribute
to more pain and suffering for them. I feel Mr. Tuley is not
fit to be a teacher if he even considers this to be o.k..
I think this episode would have been a great excuse to get
rid of him completely.
Name Withheld
Wisconsin State Journal
|
|
I am responding to your question: "Should
Turley have been removed as school newspaper supervisor?
My answer
is: Yes.
Yes, they, the school administration, did the right thing
because the teacher appeared to show no better judgement in
the issue than did some of his students. That is especially
so if it were true he had disobeyed a school directive
on the subject. When Mr. Turley, himself, "grows up"
maybe the school can give him another shot at it in the future.
He needs to think about what he did for a season.
Part of what Mr. Turley is supposed to be teaching is when
good judgement is to be used. When his employer
had told him what to do and when he ignored them, if
nothing else, he was guilty of insubordination.
If the town's newspaper, on the other hand, wanted to pick
up on that story and print it, that's a different case. The
student paper should have steered clear of the subject. There
is a big difference between students in a newspaper class
and trained investigative reporters who have some protecting
provided by their newspaper's liability insurance
if libel does become a factor.
The school administration did the right thing. School newspapers
are primarily for the "practice" of and the teaching
of specific skills. They are not for the discovery and
the promolgation of "news." It is an important
exercice for students to learn what goes into putting
together a news gathering organization and how important the
word discretion is in all we, as individuals, or as reporters,
do in this life.
We had a situation with some similarity occur in management
of the school newspaper at our local, small, 6500 student
university last year. The "supervising" professor,
I thought, had the poor judgement to approve the design of
a front page full color layout showing a condom being pulled
over a ripe banana and used as part of a (not very well supported
or received by either the students, the school administration,
or townspeople) student plea that the University start providing
access to free condoms for university students who want to
use them.
We do have a drugstore in town.
Socialism has not completely enveloped us yet, - - I hope.
Name Withheld
Salt Lake
City, UT
|
|
I support
the teacher's decision to publish the article. Teenagers (actually
all of us) are exposed to violence in every form of media
and entertainment. In particular video games and movies often
show hundreds of murders per show with seemingly no consequences.
They must be shown that murder is in fact a horrendous act
with dire consequences--both legally and morally. Protecting
them from this information does not serve their moral development.
As far as the sister of the accused is concerned, I seriously
doubt that withholding the article from the school newspaper
kept the other students from knowing about it.
Sincerely,
Jane Oglesby
Garden Grove, CA
|
|
Regarding
the article "Stop The Presses"
If Chad Tuleys son was the boy that was facing murder
charges, would Mr. Tuley have placed the article in the school
paper? Would he have wanted his daughter to be exposed to
possible embarrassment, stress, or unwanted negative attention
during this very difficult time? What was Mr. Tuleys
motivation when he felt that this story should be placed in
student newspaper? I am sure it got a lot of attention in
the local editions and the student body was aware of the tragedy.
The accused boy and his family are dealing with a crisis.
The school paper is not the place to run an article that has
been copied from local newspapers. The local press is trying
to sell their information. The school paper should reflect
leadership accomplishments and plenty of praise for
the students and faculty within the school. If Mr Tuley wanted
to say something regarding this tragedy, wouldnt it
have been better to just print something simple and heartfelt
like "The students and the faculty of ---- school wish
to extend our prayers and support to the
family
during this most difficult time. "
Sharon
Koscoe, Mission Viejo CA
|
|
I read
the article of the teacher taking off the school newspaper
as supervisor in the Orange County Register. My name is Jim
Teixeira of Orange County, California.
My bottom line opinion: the board of that school are nothing
more than a bunch of trained chimps. I am SO tired of reading/hearing/seeing
people trying to play the cover up game or better yet re-writing
history to appease someone who may be offended by it. History
is history and facts are facts. Print stories that are true
and of concern for a community to keep people aware, and tell
the rest of the people who disagree with that to wake the
heck up and come out into the sunlight of the year 2004 and
learn to live life as a very aware, educated and contributing
factor to the community's well being.
|
|
Regardless of the circumstance the supervisor of the school
newspaper is under the sanction of the school officials
who are accountable to the school board elected by the
community. The supervisor took action in direct opposition
to his superior's directive; and with that he must accept
the consequences of his actions. If you disobey the boss you
get reprimanded because you are responsible to him. If you
don't like the rules don't accept the position.
In regard to the content, the supervisor showed no consideration
for the younger sister; and should be releived of his position
for lack of judgement. Would he accept an article written
about his little sister accused of prostitution?I think not.
I suspect that ego got in the way of clear thinking and common
decency.
MP
|
|
|
As a public
school teacher with 38 years experience, I believe that the
administration at Chad Tuley's school was definitely off the
mark when they issued the directive to avoid publishing the
story about the student accused of murder in the
school newspaper.
When an incident such as this occurs, especially in a middle
or high school, there is always rumor and gossip that runs
rampant. In order to quell this, the administration should
have issued a statement to the parents and should have allowed
Mr. Tuley's students to publish the article with the known
facts. In doing this, the sister of the accused murderer would
have been hurt much less by the article than by the rumor
and gossip that would otherwise surround her.
And what lesson is the administration teaching? The only lesson
I see in your description of the incident is that all problems
are solved through denial. In denying that the
problem exists and in attempting to cover up the problem
through censorship of the newspaper, many more problems are
thus created.
William Dyson
Georgia
|
|
Mr. Seglin:
I don't think we have enough information to answer this. For
instance, why was there a directive to withhold the story?
Was the sister consulted? If the sister begged them to not
write a story about her brother, then Mr. Tuley definitely
acted inappropriately.
However, if high school is still the seething hotbed of rampant
gossip that it was when I attended, and I suspect it is, then
a well-researched and thoughtful article could have helped
dispel the rumours that plagued the poor girl as she tried
to just get through the day. Again, I'd like to know where
she stands on the subject.
Mr. Tuley was reinstated as a teacher, which I think indicates
that he otherwise did a fine job teaching. He may have thought
he was doing the sister and the school a favor. According
to this article, at "http:// www.wishtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=2585726&nav=CPFQTIN0"
the students are planning a walkout and wearing t-shirts that
say "Free Mr. Tuley." On the other hand, he may
have just been trying to capitalize on a local tragedy to
grab a little attention. I think the sister should have the
most say in the matter.
Thanks,
Diana Thoren
Atlanta Journal & Constitution
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in the e-mails to
The Right Thing: Sound Off section of this Web site are
solely the views of the those who sent them. They do not
reflect the views of Jeff Seglin, The New York Times Syndicate
or The New York Times Company.
|
back
to top
|
|